1 简介
在分析灰狼优化算法不足的基础上,提出一种改进的灰狼优化算法(CGWO),该算法采用基于余弦规律变化的收敛因子,平衡算法的全局搜索和局部搜索能力,同时引入基于步长欧氏距离的比例权重更新灰狼位置,从而加快算法的收敛速度.对8个经典测试函数进行仿真实验,结果表明CGWO算法的求解精度更高,稳定性更好.最后以预测谷氨酸菌体生长浓度为例,利用CGWO算法估计Richards模型的参数,以均方根误差和平均绝对误差作为评价指标,与PSO算法,GA算法和VS-FOA算法的结果进行比较,CGWO算法可以有效地估计Richards模型中的参数.
2 部分代码
%___________________________________________________________________%
% Grey Wold Optimizer (GWO) source codes version 1.0 %
% %
%___________________________________________________________________%
% Grey Wolf Optimizer
function [Alpha_score,Alpha_pos,Convergence_curve]=GWO(SearchAgents_no,Max_iter,lb,ub,dim,fobj)
% initialize alpha, beta, and delta_pos
Alpha_pos=zeros(1,dim);
Alpha_score=inf; %change this to -inf for maximization problems
Beta_pos=zeros(1,dim);
Beta_score=inf; %change this to -inf for maximization problems
Delta_pos=zeros(1,dim);
Delta_score=inf; %change this to -inf for maximization problems
%Initialize the positions of search agents
Positions=initialization(SearchAgents_no,dim,ub,lb);
Convergence_curve=zeros(1,Max_iter);
l=0;% Loop counter
% Main loop
while l<Max_iter
for i=1:size(Positions,1)
% Return back the search agents that go beyond the boundaries of the search space
Flag4ub=Positions(i,:)>ub;
Flag4lb=Positions(i,:)<lb;
Positions(i,:)=(Positions(i,:).*(~(Flag4ub+Flag4lb)))+ub.*Flag4ub+lb.*Flag4lb;
% Calculate objective function for each search agent
fitness=fobj(Positions(i,:));
% Update Alpha, Beta, and Delta
if fitness<Alpha_score
Alpha_score=fitness; % Update alpha
Alpha_pos=Positions(i,:);
end
if fitness>Alpha_score && fitness<Beta_score
Beta_score=fitness; % Update beta
Beta_pos=Positions(i,:);
end
if fitness>Alpha_score && fitness>Beta_score && fitness<Delta_score
Delta_score=fitness; % Update delta
Delta_pos=Positions(i,:);
end
end
% a decreases linearly fron 2 to 0
a=sin(((l*pi)/Max_iter)+pi/2)+1;
% Update the Position of search agents including omegas
for i=1:size(Positions,1)
for j=1:size(Positions,2)
r1=rand(); % r1 is a random number in [0,1]
r2=rand(); % r2 is a random number in [0,1]
A1=2*a*r1-a; % Equation (3.3)
C1=2*r2; % Equation (3.4)
D_alpha=abs(C1*Alpha_pos(j)-Positions(i,j)); % Equation (3.5)-part 1
X1=Alpha_pos(j)-A1*D_alpha; % Equation (3.6)-part 1
r1=rand();
r2=rand();
A2=2*a*r1-a; % Equation (3.3)
C2=2*r2; % Equation (3.4)
D_beta=abs(C2*Beta_pos(j)-Positions(i,j)); % Equation (3.5)-part 2
X2=Beta_pos(j)-A2*D_beta; % Equation (3.6)-part 2
r1=rand();
r2=rand();
A3=2*a*r1-a; % Equation (3.3)
C3=2*r2; % Equation (3.4)
D_delta=abs(C3*Delta_pos(j)-Positions(i,j)); % Equation (3.5)-part 3
X3=Delta_pos(j)-A3*D_delta; % Equation (3.5)-part 3
Positions(i,j)=(X1+X2+X3)/3;% Equation (3.7)
end
end
l=l+1;
Convergence_curve(l)=Alpha_score;
end
3 仿真结果
4 参考文献
[1]王秋萍, 王梦娜, 王晓峰. 改进收敛因子和比例权重的灰狼优化算法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2019, 55(21):7.